Halesowen Tonight? & Predictions

How much is it tonight? Normal price or reduced?

Normal price I'd imagine mate.

Altered thread title to accommodate predictions.

I'll go 2-0 Reds - Jones, big fella from Banbury (forgot his name).
Att 207

It's normal price.
4-0 Reds.
Deards 2, OG,Grimes
188

Redditch 3-0 Halesowen

Deards (2) and Carter.

Att. 176

Reds 1-0 Moses Garvey

201

Reds 1 Haloween 0

Deards

Att 145

Cheers. I may goto watch Stratford v Westfields as it is only a deep sea diver

Redditch 1 v Halesowen 2

Deards

ATT 169

Reds 3 - Halesowen 0 -Deards att 314

is that a deards hatrick? 3.1 reds the big fella (debrill?) HATRICK att 225

Reds 2 Yam Yams 1

Deards & Jones. Att 170

Reds 1 - Halesowen 1

Jones

150

FT - Reds 1-0 Yam Yams - Joe Halsall. Att 133

Redditchbluenose86 wrote:FT - Reds 1-0 Yam Yams - Joe Halsall. Att 133

not bad for a loser

Sorry what? 133? In whose world? That must include players and staff as my headcount came to 70 odd and there sure as hell wasn't a further 40 in the bar. Anyway, more of the same kick and hope from reds but our superior crossing caught them out. Into the hat for round two and a mini boost ahead of the weekend! UP THE REDS

Terrace Guy wrote:Sorry what? 133? In whose world? That must include players and staff as my headcount came to 70 odd and there sure as hell wasn't a further 40 in the bar. Anyway, more of the same kick and hope from reds but our superior crossing caught them out. Into the hat for round two and a mini boost ahead of the weekend! UP THE REDS

I did a count before the end of the 1st half and counted 118 not including those in the bar! I think the 133 included those who had complimentary passes!

Terrace Guy wrote:Sorry what? 133? In whose world? That must include players and staff as my headcount came to 70 odd and there sure as hell wasn't a further 40 in the bar. Anyway, more of the same kick and hope from reds but our superior crossing caught them out. Into the hat for round two and a mini boost ahead of the weekend! UP THE REDS

How dare you!
If 133 is posted then 133 it is
and who are you to say about more kick and hope from Redditch? You didnt save the club, Chris did. If he wants to appoint a kick and rush styled manager thats his choice not yours!
This club wouldnt exist if it wasnt for Swan.
Negative posts like this are not needed here thankyou.
Please try not to voice an opinion again, its not healthy.
Back Swan 100% Back Hyde 100% or get out...


is that beter?

Redditchbluenose86 wrote:FT - Reds 1-0 Yam Yams - Joe Halsall. Att 133

Joe Halsall - any relation to Mick?

ROWLY1971 wrote:

Terrace Guy wrote:Sorry what? 133? In whose world? That must include players and staff as my headcount came to 70 odd and there sure as hell wasn't a further 40 in the bar. Anyway, more of the same kick and hope from reds but our superior crossing caught them out. Into the hat for round two and a mini boost ahead of the weekend! UP THE REDS

How dare you!
If 133 is posted then 133 it is
and who are you to say about more kick and hope from Redditch? You didnt save the club, Chris did. If he wants to appoint a kick and rush styled manager thats his choice not yours!
This club wouldnt exist if it wasnt for Swan.
Negative posts like this are not needed here thankyou.
Please try not to voice an opinion again, its not healthy.
Back Swan 100% Back Hyde 100% or get out...


is that beter?

Sorry but this is all a bit strange to me..

The CLUB state 133.

1+3+3=7.

7 begins with S.

Swan also begins with the letter S!!!


The whole thing is a massive cover-up and conspiracy!!

Hyde OUT, Swan OUT, let's burn the club down and follow Bromsgrove sporting while there's still time!

Redditchbluenose86 wrote:

ROWLY1971 wrote:

Terrace Guy wrote:Sorry what? 133? In whose world? That must include players and staff as my headcount came to 70 odd and there sure as hell wasn't a further 40 in the bar. Anyway, more of the same kick and hope from reds but our superior crossing caught them out. Into the hat for round two and a mini boost ahead of the weekend! UP THE REDS

How dare you!
If 133 is posted then 133 it is
and who are you to say about more kick and hope from Redditch? You didnt save the club, Chris did. If he wants to appoint a kick and rush styled manager thats his choice not yours!
This club wouldnt exist if it wasnt for Swan.
Negative posts like this are not needed here thankyou.
Please try not to voice an opinion again, its not healthy.
Back Swan 100% Back Hyde 100% or get out...


is that beter?

Sorry but this is all a bit strange to me..

The CLUB state 133.

1+3+3=7.

7 begins with S.

Swan also begins with the letter S!!!


The whole thing is a massive cover-up and conspiracy!!

Hyde OUT, Swan OUT, let's burn the club down and follow Bromsgrove sporting while there's still time!

hahaha its area 52 and those who get to close have to be removed by the men in black! on a serious note why would the club exaggerate the figures up when the club has to share the gate money would it not make more sense to lower the number? 133 is tickets sold including comps, it does not include players or staff. interestingly compared to other gates in the cup last night we were one of the highest with the lowest being I think Banbury who had 33, another on 34 and the highest was 198. agree still not the best this team can offer but going in the right direction for sure.

^ Agree! If a club exaggerates an attendance, then it has to put extra cash in to back it up! Why would any club do that?

I was there, 133 seemed about right to me. Although I admit, I didn't make the effort to do a head count!!

Back to the football.

Debutee James Travis (no 12) came on at HT and looked impressive.

Halsall had a great game, got stuck in and scored the only goal.

Tesfa Robinson looked solid at LB against a very pacey and skilful winger (no 10).

Connor (MOM for me). Ran the play, didn't stop all game and delivered a perefect cross for Halsall's goal.

Deabill?? AKA big fella from Banbury, also looked decent. Used his height well for flick ons but was let down by support. Also forced an AMAZING save from the Yeltz' keeper from a good header.

Halesowen looked pretty decent in all fairness and kept to simple but effective football (something that seems absent alot of the time on our behalf).

Never the less a win is a win, and hopefully a booster for Sat.