REDHEAD SACKED

Terrace Guy wrote:Absolutely the right decision whichever way you look at it. Whether it was £40 or £0 both Gardiner and Redhead were on pitiful budgets and I'm afraid to say that Gardiner's teams played a better game of football than any of Redhead's whose tactics seem to revolve around 'lump it up to Mckenzie and hope for the best.' This is in no way a criticism of him as he stepped in to help in testing circumstances and we all know you can't create Brazil with a 0 budget in the Conference North and the Reds have always been a rather direct team anyway in this division. However I just think Gardiner's sides had more of a cutting edge and we want someone who will instill that in a side for next season!

Leethall wrote:

Terrace Guy wrote:Absolutely the right decision whichever way you look at it. Whether it was £40 or £0 both Gardiner and Redhead were on pitiful budgets and I'm afraid to say that Gardiner's teams played a better game of football than any of Redhead's whose tactics seem to revolve around 'lump it up to Mckenzie and hope for the best.' This is in no way a criticism of him as he stepped in to help in testing circumstances and we all know you can't create Brazil with a 0 budget in the Conference North and the Reds have always been a rather direct team anyway in this division. However I just think Gardiner's sides had more of a cutting edge and we want someone who will instill that in a side for next season!

I disagree, Gardiners team was shocking and he had the budget and all in all he used it very very badly apart from a few players.

At the begining of Redders tenure the team tried to play football but as it went on they did as you say play a little bit of hoofball to McKenzie but I still think they were a lot better than Gardiners distinctly average team. I never really got the feeling that Gardiner was cut out for management at this level, likewise Redders the same but the latters team generally were more competitive (apart from Eastwood @ home)!

in2thevalley wrote:

Leethall wrote:

Terrace Guy wrote:Absolutely the right decision whichever way you look at it. Whether it was £40 or £0 both Gardiner and Redhead were on pitiful budgets and I'm afraid to say that Gardiner's teams played a better game of football than any of Redhead's whose tactics seem to revolve around 'lump it up to Mckenzie and hope for the best.' This is in no way a criticism of him as he stepped in to help in testing circumstances and we all know you can't create Brazil with a 0 budget in the Conference North and the Reds have always been a rather direct team anyway in this division. However I just think Gardiner's sides had more of a cutting edge and we want someone who will instill that in a side for next season!

I disagree, Gardiners team was shocking and he had the budget and all in all he used it very very badly apart from a few players.

At the begining of Redders tenure the team tried to play football but as it went on they did as you say play a little bit of hoofball to McKenzie but I still think they were a lot better than Gardiners distinctly average team. I never really got the feeling that Gardiner was cut out for management at this level, likewise Redders the same but the latters team generally were more competitive (apart from Eastwood @ home)!

Agree with you on this one Lee. If I had the option as to which team to watch i.e Gards or Redders I would chose Redders everytime. They tried to play football and apart from the eastwood game gave a very good account of themselves.

porrohman wrote:Can't afford me.